1951 Lincoln Cent- Re-engraved vs Normal Bangs
Moderator: Daniel
Forum rules
Here's a link to how to post a topic with images in our community https://coinauctionshelp.com/welcome-to ... community/
___________________________________________________________________________________________________________
You also agree to follow these guidelines. You must agree to these rules to be a member of this forum. NO SPAM! Spam is deleted within minutes, no spam will ever be left in our community.
1. Post a front and back image of your coin with a specific question about what you’re seeing or asking about and one coin per topic.
2. Please remove coin from the holder unless it’s US or an official mint case or unless it is graded by a grading service.
3. Images should be taken by a camera or cell phone camera, we ask that members don’t use images through a microscope screen.
4. Always start your own topic, please don’t ask about your coin or post your coin in someone else’s coin topic.
5. Do not send private messages about your coin unless an Admin ask you too and the same for sending emails through the board.
6. No spam. Do not post any links to your coin or other non-coin websites.
7. Always be respectful even if something makes you upset or you don’t agree with a member. You can always get a second opinion elsewhere. If you have an issue then politely ask an admin in an PM. PM’s are for issues, technical and personal, but not for coin questions (refer to number 5 on this list). Our community is not a soap box for complaining or drama, so please refrain from doing so here.[/size]
Here's a link to how to post a topic with images in our community https://coinauctionshelp.com/welcome-to ... community/
___________________________________________________________________________________________________________
You also agree to follow these guidelines. You must agree to these rules to be a member of this forum. NO SPAM! Spam is deleted within minutes, no spam will ever be left in our community.
1. Post a front and back image of your coin with a specific question about what you’re seeing or asking about and one coin per topic.
2. Please remove coin from the holder unless it’s US or an official mint case or unless it is graded by a grading service.
3. Images should be taken by a camera or cell phone camera, we ask that members don’t use images through a microscope screen.
4. Always start your own topic, please don’t ask about your coin or post your coin in someone else’s coin topic.
5. Do not send private messages about your coin unless an Admin ask you too and the same for sending emails through the board.
6. No spam. Do not post any links to your coin or other non-coin websites.
7. Always be respectful even if something makes you upset or you don’t agree with a member. You can always get a second opinion elsewhere. If you have an issue then politely ask an admin in an PM. PM’s are for issues, technical and personal, but not for coin questions (refer to number 5 on this list). Our community is not a soap box for complaining or drama, so please refrain from doing so here.[/size]
-
- Forum Supporter
- Posts: 1863
- Joined: Sat Sep 21, 2013 6:08 pm
- Has thanked: 236 times
- Been thanked: 36 times
1951 Lincoln Cent- Re-engraved vs Normal Bangs
1951 Lincoln Cent- Re-engraved vs Normal Bangs
I was looking through a mixed roll of 1951 P&D wheats. I noticed the area between the forehead and bangs were different and was hoping someone might shed some light on this for me.
Does anyone know if the 1951 LWC were re-engraved like the front of the lapel on the 1953 proofs? (Not like the Channeling or Trenching on some coins which is incuse, but re-engraved which would be raised in relief.) Of the 14 coins (P&D) only 2 were "normal". The other 12 had the "re-engraving" on them.
Thanks in advance, Cliff
1rst three images are marked up showing the "Re-engraving" between the bangs and forehead that were on 12 of the coins in the roll. (It is raised, not incuse) Most (all?) of the coins also displayed the raised line down Lincoln's nose as well.
Next 3 are Coin1 (1952d) with Normal, unaccented, design at the bangs
Last 3 are Coin2 (1951p) with Normal, unaccented, design at the bangs
I was looking through a mixed roll of 1951 P&D wheats. I noticed the area between the forehead and bangs were different and was hoping someone might shed some light on this for me.
Does anyone know if the 1951 LWC were re-engraved like the front of the lapel on the 1953 proofs? (Not like the Channeling or Trenching on some coins which is incuse, but re-engraved which would be raised in relief.) Of the 14 coins (P&D) only 2 were "normal". The other 12 had the "re-engraving" on them.
Thanks in advance, Cliff
1rst three images are marked up showing the "Re-engraving" between the bangs and forehead that were on 12 of the coins in the roll. (It is raised, not incuse) Most (all?) of the coins also displayed the raised line down Lincoln's nose as well.
Next 3 are Coin1 (1952d) with Normal, unaccented, design at the bangs
Last 3 are Coin2 (1951p) with Normal, unaccented, design at the bangs
Last edited by PetesPockets55 on Tue Apr 16, 2019 9:37 am, edited 1 time in total.
- Daniel
- Administrator
- Posts: 26481
- Joined: Wed Jan 28, 2009 4:59 pm
- Location: Ohio
- Has thanked: 1146 times
- Been thanked: 4157 times
- Contact:
Re: 1951 Lincoln Cent- Re-engraved vs Normal Bangs
I am not sure why it has to go as far as saying re-engraved. It's a die mark and not uncommon on coins, just placement makes it look special. No re-engraved varieties for this year.
-
- Forum Supporter
- Posts: 1863
- Joined: Sat Sep 21, 2013 6:08 pm
- Has thanked: 236 times
- Been thanked: 36 times
Re: 1951 Lincoln Cent- Re-engraved vs Normal Bangs
But it's raised in relief like the 1953 re-engraved proofs and I haven't been back into collecting long, but I don't remember seeing it like this around the bangs on other years. How else to describe it?
I was just referring to it as "Re-engraved" because that was the term for the 1953 proofs. It is not incuse like the term "channeling" describes.
I wonder if the 1953 proofs garnered extra attention because they are proofs or because they were discovered by Dr. Wiles who is the attributor/author for Variety Vista. His noticing it certainly would be a boost to a varieties acceptance. Then again getting an FS# didn't hurt. happydance:
I was just referring to it as "Re-engraved" because that was the term for the 1953 proofs. It is not incuse like the term "channeling" describes.
I wonder if the 1953 proofs garnered extra attention because they are proofs or because they were discovered by Dr. Wiles who is the attributor/author for Variety Vista. His noticing it certainly would be a boost to a varieties acceptance. Then again getting an FS# didn't hurt. happydance:
- Daniel
- Administrator
- Posts: 26481
- Joined: Wed Jan 28, 2009 4:59 pm
- Location: Ohio
- Has thanked: 1146 times
- Been thanked: 4157 times
- Contact:
Re: 1951 Lincoln Cent- Re-engraved vs Normal Bangs
I just feel it is more proper to call it a die mark. If you think it was struck with a retired proof die then send it to Wiles or Mike Diamond or someone of that ilk. The FS-401 has marks other places as well.
-
- Forum Supporter
- Posts: 1863
- Joined: Sat Sep 21, 2013 6:08 pm
- Has thanked: 236 times
- Been thanked: 36 times
Re: 1951 Lincoln Cent- Re-engraved vs Normal Bangs
Sorry about that. I don't think it is a retired proof die in any way, shape, or form and didn't mean to imply it.
(BTW- So no one reading this thread gets the wrong idea, I'm not trying to create a furor to hype it, I'm just trying to understand.)
Just trying to understand the interest in the re-engraved proofs as a variety, but not business strikes. And what seems even more bizarre, from my small sample, is that most 1951 P&D Lincoln's show these die marks or "re-engraving". It may be harder to find examples with out it. Maybe a subset of collectors out there that collect by subtle design changes over the years already have this anomaly as part of their collection.
I'm probably wrong to think so, but calling these die marks suggest something very random and accidental. This highlighting of the design on the 1951 Lincoln seems as intentional as the re-engraving on the 1939, 1950 and 1953 proof varieties. A different area perhaps and only a business strike, but very intentional.
EDIT: Maybe I should have to refered to it as an "accented design"?
(BTW- So no one reading this thread gets the wrong idea, I'm not trying to create a furor to hype it, I'm just trying to understand.)
Just trying to understand the interest in the re-engraved proofs as a variety, but not business strikes. And what seems even more bizarre, from my small sample, is that most 1951 P&D Lincoln's show these die marks or "re-engraving". It may be harder to find examples with out it. Maybe a subset of collectors out there that collect by subtle design changes over the years already have this anomaly as part of their collection.
I'm probably wrong to think so, but calling these die marks suggest something very random and accidental. This highlighting of the design on the 1951 Lincoln seems as intentional as the re-engraving on the 1939, 1950 and 1953 proof varieties. A different area perhaps and only a business strike, but very intentional.
EDIT: Maybe I should have to refered to it as an "accented design"?
- Paul
- Master Die Variety Examiner
- Posts: 19064
- Joined: Wed May 29, 2013 9:19 pm
- Location: Wisconsin
- Has thanked: 906 times
- Been thanked: 3319 times
Re: 1951 Lincoln Cent- Re-engraved vs Normal Bangs
Cliff, have you "measured" the size of this itty-bitty mark?
whistling2:
whistling2:
- Daniel
- Administrator
- Posts: 26481
- Joined: Wed Jan 28, 2009 4:59 pm
- Location: Ohio
- Has thanked: 1146 times
- Been thanked: 4157 times
- Contact:
Re: 1951 Lincoln Cent- Re-engraved vs Normal Bangs
It could be remnants of a die clash.Re-engraving happened when part of the proof design was accidentally removed or "weakened". So die mark is most appropriate considering.
-
- Forum Supporter
- Posts: 1863
- Joined: Sat Sep 21, 2013 6:08 pm
- Has thanked: 236 times
- Been thanked: 36 times
Re: 1951 Lincoln Cent- Re-engraved vs Normal Bangs
Paul, I have no scope for measuring at this time.
Here's a couple of better images of the enhancement. And on some of the examples it extends down the forehead.
Since it is not scarce according to the quantity I found in my small sample, it seems it was on a working hub or master die. I have since found it on some 1951s coins as well. It's entirely possible it is on all dies but have been abraded away by mint employees doing die maintenance.
Examples on the PCGS webite are hard to tell as the lighting in most of their images puts this area in the shadows.
Here's a couple of better images of the enhancement. And on some of the examples it extends down the forehead.
Since it is not scarce according to the quantity I found in my small sample, it seems it was on a working hub or master die. I have since found it on some 1951s coins as well. It's entirely possible it is on all dies but have been abraded away by mint employees doing die maintenance.
Examples on the PCGS webite are hard to tell as the lighting in most of their images puts this area in the shadows.
- Daniel
- Administrator
- Posts: 26481
- Joined: Wed Jan 28, 2009 4:59 pm
- Location: Ohio
- Has thanked: 1146 times
- Been thanked: 4157 times
- Contact:
Re: 1951 Lincoln Cent- Re-engraved vs Normal Bangs
Much better images and looks almost like a die crack here.
-
- Forum Supporter
- Posts: 1863
- Joined: Sat Sep 21, 2013 6:08 pm
- Has thanked: 236 times
- Been thanked: 36 times
Re: 1951 Lincoln Cent- Re-engraved vs Normal Bangs
Yeah with the little bumps along the line. I'm guessing that whatever tool was used "bumped" along instead of a nice even groove.
- Paul
- Master Die Variety Examiner
- Posts: 19064
- Joined: Wed May 29, 2013 9:19 pm
- Location: Wisconsin
- Has thanked: 906 times
- Been thanked: 3319 times
- PresidentPC
- Coining Around
- Posts: 1
- Joined: Fri Apr 19, 2019 7:22 pm
Re: 1951 Lincoln Cent- Re-engraved vs Normal Bangs
Hmm, I better look very close in there...may need to re-adjust the price.
- Paul
- Master Die Variety Examiner
- Posts: 19064
- Joined: Wed May 29, 2013 9:19 pm
- Location: Wisconsin
- Has thanked: 906 times
- Been thanked: 3319 times
- Daniel
- Administrator
- Posts: 26481
- Joined: Wed Jan 28, 2009 4:59 pm
- Location: Ohio
- Has thanked: 1146 times
- Been thanked: 4157 times
- Contact:
Re: 1951 Lincoln Cent- Re-engraved vs Normal Bangs
Please start another topic with a question. ThanksPresidentPC wrote: ↑Fri Apr 19, 2019 7:39 pm Hmm, I better look very close in there...may need to re-adjust the price.
-
- Similar Topics
- Replies
- Views
- Last post
-
- 5 Replies
- 1857 Views
-
Last post by Daniel
-
- 9 Replies
- 1912 Views
-
Last post by chakosh
-
- 9 Replies
- 1527 Views
-
Last post by chakosh
-
- 11 Replies
- 2615 Views
-
Last post by Daniel
-
- 2 Replies
- 326 Views
-
Last post by Paul
-
- 2 Replies
- 2624 Views
-
Last post by Daniel
-
- 3 Replies
- 2384 Views
-
Last post by manda8162
-
- 2 Replies
- 360 Views
-
Last post by Coinaddict411
-
- 2 Replies
- 807 Views
-
Last post by periklis
-
- 4 Replies
- 443 Views
-
Last post by CoinCraze