COIN Help U Community

Take a very close look at the tops of the "U" and the final "6" in the date.... Using your images here for attribution, I would say that this is Not the FS – 101 As most of you already know, variety attribution of coins with very close doubling, ( … something that's not obvious ...

I agree with the VV being a terrible example to use. Wexler's pics/example are much better in this case.

MS63

No way . Sorry .

Ms-62

it's split plating and not an RPM

MS62 PL ? Nice coin!

Found this tonight and was shocked at how good it looked. Would need an MS67 to make it worthwhile. What say you? (Forgive me if I'm crazy for even asking) Crazy for asking...no way! Its how we learn, by asking :) The pics show what I think is too much scratching and marks on its surface - but its ...

I have an entire essay on just the No FG Kennedy halves linked to in my signature. It is a comprehensive, data filled (with links), study into the No FG varieties as slabbed by the "professionals" at PCGS You find the facts about the only actual (non-die abrasion) No FG made in 1982 (the r...

Looking good to me

It is better that you send it off for authentication.

Nice find!

Nice

I don't know, tough when it's not "in hand" BUT there is some roughness on the upper hair and the cap even looks off in the pics. It's just really banged up for not much wear...seems like an obvious one to get authenticated and graded. AU-ish Let us know. Cheers, Kenny P.S. ...and the wing...

AU but hard to determine condition based on the images.

It's really hard to tell because light in photos can make things look different than they really are. It looks to me like the hair above Liberty's ear is slightly grayish which would indicate to me an AU-55-58 coin. The jump between AU and MS-60 is considerable for this date though, so if that grayi...