Jefferson nickel 2000-P peel error small number 198 upper front head ?

Message

Braddock · #1 Unread post by **Braddock** » Sun Dec 13, 2020 1:01 am

This a peel error ?? he have a little date or number 198 just upper the front of jefferson head ?? i circled it in red

SensibleSal66 · Sun Dec 13, 2020 1:07 am

I really don't want to know. lol . If I had to guess , it would be some kind of glue.I would Heat it up with a hot pin and to test it . Let me know what you find out .

Braddock · #3 Unread post by **Braddock** » Sun Dec 13, 2020 1:36 am

Just upper the front or head in dark cracka have number 198 ???

SensibleSal66 · Sun Dec 13, 2020 1:49 am

Can you provide more pics .I don't see what you mean,

Paul · #5 Unread post by **Paul** » Sun Dec 13, 2020 10:34 am

What you are seeing on your coin is a clear foreign substance......

Braddock · #6 Unread post by **Braddock** » Sun Dec 13, 2020 2:36 pm

I circled it in red

Braddock · #7 Unread post by **Braddock** » Sun Dec 13, 2020 3:01 pm

I do not understand what you mean when speaking of substance I don't know the liquid subtance which has formed a precise outline to the limit I would say that these other metal when we manufacture the piece and the number look in the red circle

Braddock · #8 Unread post by **Braddock** » Sun Dec 13, 2020 4:45 pm

more angle for you look a extra metal or substance i dont know what the correctly terms i will used for it and the result looking different because i take pics with differents source light for mores others details

Paul · #9 Unread post by **Paul** » Sun Dec 13, 2020 4:56 pm

What type of imaging device are you using please?

Braddock · #10 Unread post by **Braddock** » Sun Dec 13, 2020 5:27 pm

cellphone galaxy s7 pic taked under different light source im not expert in imaging device or photography

Paul · #11 Unread post by **Paul** » Sun Dec 13, 2020 6:14 pm

Thank you,
Keep in mind that when you have a foreign substance like yours on the surface of the coin, an additional coin placed over the top of that, can leave the details of that secondary coin in that foreign substance…

Braddock · #12 Unread post by **Braddock** » Sun Dec 13, 2020 7:40 pm

if is a strange substance God we trust haved been strucked in this substance the letter is on the substance and flush and no distanced and this strange substance like transparent and is impregnate not appear after the struck look this pic so that its is struck with such precision and no distance squaring and the substance haved not overwhelmed and the substance is not overflowed from the rim and not having caused more stains or spreading everywhere on the piece I have the impression the metal was already damaged before the struck.if the substance had freshly strucked during manufacture the appearance and result would not have been like a grease error? that's why I think the coin where the material was already asleep even before it was strucked??

Braddock · #13 Unread post by **Braddock** » Sun Dec 13, 2020 8:06 pm

with the appearance we clearly distinguish that the words trust and others were strucked over the suggested substance not below clearly visible that the words trust was strucked over it so yes I think it was there even before it was strucked

Earle42 · #14 Unread post by **Earle42** » Mon Dec 14, 2020 12:58 am

This is simply glue or some other substance that was put onto the coin AFTER the coin left the mint. People post stuff like this on coin forums all the time. People do all sorts of strange things to coins, or the substance might have stuck there by accident if the coin was dropped into it.

There is nothing at the mint or in the minting process which would make anything looking like this at all. It is post mint damage to the coin.

You can see if it will peel off with your fingernail or you could soak it in PURE acetone. Acetone cannot chemically react/harm the metal of the coin. It is just a stronger solvent than water. The acetone will likely remove the substance by making it quit sticking to the coin, or the acetone will simply dissolve it.

What you see as a small 8 is likely just pareidolia, or as Paul has said, if another coin was introduce to the glue/whatever when it was till soft, a backwards image of what was on the other coin can appear in the substance.

clearly visible that the words trust was strucked over it so yes I think it was there even before it was strucked

I this case the base of the T would not be sticking out from under the substance as can clearly be see in in the picture.

these coins have 20 tons of pressure put onto them to strike them. There is no way:
1. Any substance was on the meticulously cleaned/tumbled planchet before it got into the press, and
2. That any substance such as this would not be squeezed entirely out from between the coin and dies when it had 20 tons of pressure applied to it.

Something that may help in understanding all of this is to research the coin making process. It will help you determine true errors from coins like this one.

Braddock · #15 Unread post by **Braddock** » Mon Dec 14, 2020 4:53 am

thank you for your help you are the expert I ask questions to better learn and understand

Daniel · #16 Unread post by **Daniel** » Mon Dec 14, 2020 9:23 pm

This coin has a clear nail polish or some other substance on it, so it's not a mint error.

COIN Help U Community

Jefferson nickel 2000-P peel error small number 198 upper front head ?

Jefferson nickel 2000-P peel error small number 198 upper front head ?

Re: Jefferson nickel 2000-P peel error ?

Re: Jefferson nickel 2000-P upper the front or head little number 198 peel error ?

Re: Jefferson nickel 2000-P peel error small number 198 upper front head?

Re: Jefferson nickel 2000-P peel error small number 198 upper front head?

Re: Jefferson nickel 2000-P peel error small number 198 upper front head?

Re: Jefferson nickel 2000-P peel error small number 198 upper front head?

Re: Jefferson nickel 2000-P peel error small number 198 upper front head?

Re: Jefferson nickel 2000-P peel error small number 198 upper front head ?

Re: Jefferson nickel 2000-P peel error small number 198 upper front head ?

Re: Jefferson nickel 2000-P peel error small number 198 upper front head ?

Re: Jefferson nickel 2000-P peel error small number 198 upper front head ?

Re: Jefferson nickel 2000-P peel error small number 198 upper front head ?

Re: Jefferson nickel 2000-P peel error small number 198 upper front head ?

Re: Jefferson nickel 2000-P peel error small number 198 upper front head ?

Re: Jefferson nickel 2000-P peel error small number 198 upper front head ?