Picked this up from the Bay last week and was wondering if any one can give me an idea of what you think the grade might be. I have limited knowledge and aptitude for clad coinage but was intrigued enough with how nice this looked to bid. (Won it by 40 cents). The same seller had another in the same auction and again yesterday but his one was by far the nicest.
Thanks for any input, Cliff
1982 No P roosevelt dime (FS-10-1982-501)
Moderator: Daniel
Forum rules
Here's a link to how to post a topic with images in our community https://coinauctionshelp.com/welcome-to ... community/
___________________________________________________________________________________________________________
You also agree to follow these guidelines. You must agree to these rules to be a member of this forum. NO SPAM! Spam is deleted within minutes, no spam will ever be left in our community.
1. Post a front and back image of your coin with a specific question about what you’re seeing or asking about and one coin per topic.
2. Please remove coin from the holder unless it’s US or an official mint case or unless it is graded by a grading service.
3. Images should be taken by a camera or cell phone camera, we ask that members don’t use images through a microscope screen.
4. Always start your own topic, please don’t ask about your coin or post your coin in someone else’s coin topic.
5. Do not send private messages about your coin unless an Admin ask you too and the same for sending emails through the board.
6. No spam. Do not post any links to your coin or other non-coin websites.
7. Always be respectful even if something makes you upset or you don’t agree with a member. You can always get a second opinion elsewhere. If you have an issue then politely ask an admin in an PM. PM’s are for issues, technical and personal, but not for coin questions (refer to number 5 on this list). Our community is not a soap box for complaining or drama, so please refrain from doing so here.[/size]
Here's a link to how to post a topic with images in our community https://coinauctionshelp.com/welcome-to ... community/
___________________________________________________________________________________________________________
You also agree to follow these guidelines. You must agree to these rules to be a member of this forum. NO SPAM! Spam is deleted within minutes, no spam will ever be left in our community.
1. Post a front and back image of your coin with a specific question about what you’re seeing or asking about and one coin per topic.
2. Please remove coin from the holder unless it’s US or an official mint case or unless it is graded by a grading service.
3. Images should be taken by a camera or cell phone camera, we ask that members don’t use images through a microscope screen.
4. Always start your own topic, please don’t ask about your coin or post your coin in someone else’s coin topic.
5. Do not send private messages about your coin unless an Admin ask you too and the same for sending emails through the board.
6. No spam. Do not post any links to your coin or other non-coin websites.
7. Always be respectful even if something makes you upset or you don’t agree with a member. You can always get a second opinion elsewhere. If you have an issue then politely ask an admin in an PM. PM’s are for issues, technical and personal, but not for coin questions (refer to number 5 on this list). Our community is not a soap box for complaining or drama, so please refrain from doing so here.[/size]
-
- Forum Supporter
- Posts: 1863
- Joined: Sat Sep 21, 2013 6:08 pm
- Has thanked: 236 times
- Been thanked: 36 times
- Daniel
- Administrator
- Posts: 26481
- Joined: Wed Jan 28, 2009 4:59 pm
- Location: Ohio
- Has thanked: 1146 times
- Been thanked: 4157 times
- Contact:
Re: 1982 No P roosevelt dime (FS-10-1982-501)
I would say MS64 to MS65. It is a nice coin and in the images it looks gem.
- Paul
- Master Die Variety Examiner
- Posts: 19064
- Joined: Wed May 29, 2013 9:19 pm
- Location: Wisconsin
- Has thanked: 906 times
- Been thanked: 3319 times
Re: 1982 No P roosevelt dime (FS-10-1982-501)
hey C,
are you sure this is the 501,.... & not the 502 ?? :dunno :confused:
are you sure this is the 501,.... & not the 502 ?? :dunno :confused:
-
- Forum Supporter
- Posts: 1863
- Joined: Sat Sep 21, 2013 6:08 pm
- Has thanked: 236 times
- Been thanked: 36 times
Re: 1982 No P roosevelt dime (FS-10-1982-501)
P,
Pretty sure it's 501. (Is the 502 the weak strike?) Comparing mine to the PCGS example here. , it has the same die crack at K-1 obverse from the hair to the rim.
I did find an image (don't know where now) of what was described as a weak strike that had the 2 blending into and becoming one with the rim.
The example I got is much nicer than quite a few on HA Auctions, even those at MS66.
So I am hopeful and plan on getting it slabbed. Just hope there hasn't been any "not-so-funny" stuff done to it.
Pretty sure it's 501. (Is the 502 the weak strike?) Comparing mine to the PCGS example here. , it has the same die crack at K-1 obverse from the hair to the rim.
I did find an image (don't know where now) of what was described as a weak strike that had the 2 blending into and becoming one with the rim.
The example I got is much nicer than quite a few on HA Auctions, even those at MS66.
So I am hopeful and plan on getting it slabbed. Just hope there hasn't been any "not-so-funny" stuff done to it.
- Paul
- Master Die Variety Examiner
- Posts: 19064
- Joined: Wed May 29, 2013 9:19 pm
- Location: Wisconsin
- Has thanked: 906 times
- Been thanked: 3319 times
Re: 1982 No P roosevelt dime (FS-10-1982-501)
C,
here is what i have,.......
i DID NOT look very hard for the "DIE STATE PUPS" on this one,.......??
here is what i have,.......
i DID NOT look very hard for the "DIE STATE PUPS" on this one,.......??
-
- Forum Supporter
- Posts: 1863
- Joined: Sat Sep 21, 2013 6:08 pm
- Has thanked: 236 times
- Been thanked: 36 times
Re: 1982 No P roosevelt dime (FS-10-1982-501)
Thanks Paul for those comparison images.
It is interesting that CONECA uses the same variety number for both the weak and strong strike but the FS# is 501 (Strong) and 502 (Weak). Is that because CONECA considers them to be from the same die, but a different stage?
BTW- the weak strike above looks the same as the image I found online before bidding so I was confident it really was a strong strike and didn't just take the sellers word for it. I also realized the weakness on the 2 and the die crack on the head was an indication of an older die.
Amazing that it is finally sinking in, the correlation between the age of a die and how nice and crisp and sharp the devices are. happydance:
Uhhh, Hello!! Finally getting somewhere lol: !
It is interesting that CONECA uses the same variety number for both the weak and strong strike but the FS# is 501 (Strong) and 502 (Weak). Is that because CONECA considers them to be from the same die, but a different stage?
BTW- the weak strike above looks the same as the image I found online before bidding so I was confident it really was a strong strike and didn't just take the sellers word for it. I also realized the weakness on the 2 and the die crack on the head was an indication of an older die.
Amazing that it is finally sinking in, the correlation between the age of a die and how nice and crisp and sharp the devices are. happydance:
Uhhh, Hello!! Finally getting somewhere lol: !
-
- Similar Topics
- Replies
- Views
- Last post
-
- 5 Replies
- 1049 Views
-
Last post by Earle42
-
- 6 Replies
- 711 Views
-
Last post by E012073
-
- 7 Replies
- 438 Views
-
Last post by Earle42
-
- 3 Replies
- 336 Views
-
Last post by Daniel
-
- 8 Replies
- 589 Views
-
Last post by Paul
-
- 3 Replies
- 409 Views
-
Last post by Paul
-
- 1 Replies
- 454 Views
-
Last post by muswell65
-
- 2 Replies
- 1362 Views
-
Last post by Paul
-
- 5 Replies
- 2278 Views
-
Last post by RedMan
-
- 1 Replies
- 1345 Views
-
Last post by PetesPockets55