Untrusted 200?? Lincoln Cent
Moderator: Daniel
Forum rules
Here's a link to how to post a topic with images in our community https://coinauctionshelp.com/welcome-to ... community/
___________________________________________________________________________________________________________
You also agree to follow these guidelines. You must agree to these rules to be a member of this forum. NO SPAM! Spam is deleted within minutes, no spam will ever be left in our community.
1. Post a front and back image of your coin with a specific question about what you’re seeing or asking about and one coin per topic.
2. Please remove coin from the holder unless it’s US or an official mint case or unless it is graded by a grading service.
3. Images should be taken by a camera or cell phone camera, we ask that members don’t use images through a microscope screen.
4. Always start your own topic, please don’t ask about your coin or post your coin in someone else’s coin topic.
5. Do not send private messages about your coin unless an Admin ask you too and the same for sending emails through the board.
6. No spam. Do not post any links to your coin or other non-coin websites.
7. Always be respectful even if something makes you upset or you don’t agree with a member. You can always get a second opinion elsewhere. If you have an issue then politely ask an admin in an PM. PM’s are for issues, technical and personal, but not for coin questions (refer to number 5 on this list). Our community is not a soap box for complaining or drama, so please refrain from doing so here.[/size]
Here's a link to how to post a topic with images in our community https://coinauctionshelp.com/welcome-to ... community/
___________________________________________________________________________________________________________
You also agree to follow these guidelines. You must agree to these rules to be a member of this forum. NO SPAM! Spam is deleted within minutes, no spam will ever be left in our community.
1. Post a front and back image of your coin with a specific question about what you’re seeing or asking about and one coin per topic.
2. Please remove coin from the holder unless it’s US or an official mint case or unless it is graded by a grading service.
3. Images should be taken by a camera or cell phone camera, we ask that members don’t use images through a microscope screen.
4. Always start your own topic, please don’t ask about your coin or post your coin in someone else’s coin topic.
5. Do not send private messages about your coin unless an Admin ask you too and the same for sending emails through the board.
6. No spam. Do not post any links to your coin or other non-coin websites.
7. Always be respectful even if something makes you upset or you don’t agree with a member. You can always get a second opinion elsewhere. If you have an issue then politely ask an admin in an PM. PM’s are for issues, technical and personal, but not for coin questions (refer to number 5 on this list). Our community is not a soap box for complaining or drama, so please refrain from doing so here.[/size]
Untrusted 200?? Lincoln Cent
Is this coin struck through grease or PMD. It looks like the neck and face of Lincoln is slightly affected as well as the reverse of the coin. Your feedbacks and opinion will be highly appreciated.
- Daniel
- Administrator
- Posts: 26230
- Joined: Wed Jan 28, 2009 4:59 pm
- Location: Ohio
- Has thanked: 1123 times
- Been thanked: 4093 times
- Contact:
Re: Untrusted 200?? Lincoln Cent
Looks like damage to me, lot of whiz lines from something abrasive.
- Paul
- Master Die Variety Examiner
- Posts: 18835
- Joined: Wed May 29, 2013 9:19 pm
- Location: Wisconsin
- Has thanked: 897 times
- Been thanked: 3272 times
Re: Untrusted 200?? Lincoln Cent
hmmmmmmm....... :dunno :confused: :dunno
can i see some better pics of the 'base of' lincolns bust plz ??
can i see some better pics of the 'base of' lincolns bust plz ??
Re: Untrusted 200?? Lincoln Cent
If the anomaly was caused post mint by an abrasive the rim of the coin should have been affected. As it is the rim is perfectly normal with just the field affected.
- Paul
- Master Die Variety Examiner
- Posts: 18835
- Joined: Wed May 29, 2013 9:19 pm
- Location: Wisconsin
- Has thanked: 897 times
- Been thanked: 3272 times
Re: Untrusted 200?? Lincoln Cent
well, i can say that i've never seen this exact anomaly before....... :confused:
but, i will tell you what i see/think :
i do see these light 'brush marks / scrapes' on the base of lincolns bust, a patch at obv K7-8 near the rim,... on the reverse: under the 'A' in america, & what looks like some very fine "whisper-fine" looking brush marks around the 'O E' area of one cent.....
:eureka:
but seeing these marks up on a device (lincoln),.....
it leads me to believe "PMD" (post mint damage).....using your images only....IMO
but, i will tell you what i see/think :
i do see these light 'brush marks / scrapes' on the base of lincolns bust, a patch at obv K7-8 near the rim,... on the reverse: under the 'A' in america, & what looks like some very fine "whisper-fine" looking brush marks around the 'O E' area of one cent.....
:eureka:
but seeing these marks up on a device (lincoln),.....
it leads me to believe "PMD" (post mint damage).....using your images only....IMO
Re: Untrusted 200?? Lincoln Cent
I am posting here an enhanced photo for better analysis. I also tried scraping a small area with a toothpick but the 'paint like substance' is hardened.
- Daniel
- Administrator
- Posts: 26230
- Joined: Wed Jan 28, 2009 4:59 pm
- Location: Ohio
- Has thanked: 1123 times
- Been thanked: 4093 times
- Contact:
Re: Untrusted 200?? Lincoln Cent
It's not a substance the surface has been abraded. It looks like steel wool or something was used on this coin's surface.
- mhonzell
- Administrator
- Posts: 2734
- Joined: Mon Jul 22, 2013 2:14 pm
- Location: Arizona
- Has thanked: 172 times
- Been thanked: 461 times
Re: Untrusted 200?? Lincoln Cent
I was thinking a wire wheel, but as OP stated, rim is not affected. Would be hard to abrade manually without hitting the rim.
- Paul
- Master Die Variety Examiner
- Posts: 18835
- Joined: Wed May 29, 2013 9:19 pm
- Location: Wisconsin
- Has thanked: 897 times
- Been thanked: 3272 times
-
- Forum Supporter
- Posts: 1863
- Joined: Sat Sep 21, 2013 6:08 pm
- Has thanked: 236 times
- Been thanked: 36 times
Re: Untrusted 200?? Lincoln Cent
Even if it is a "paint like substance" it would be PMD but could also explain how the rim, bust and other devices could be wiped down with a cloth to remove substance before hardening.budung wrote:I am posting here an enhanced photo for better analysis. I also tried scraping a small area with a toothpick but the 'paint like substance' is hardened.
Re: Untrusted 200?? Lincoln Cent
Being a newbie in coin collecting I would have sworn the anomaly on the coin is a paint. Daniel it really take years of experience and study to spot the difference. So I did a little experiment that shows the ff: It is not a paint or a substance after all, trying to duplicate the anomaly is very difficult specially on the almost consistent direction/depth of the abrasion and the clean shape of a quarter moon, the composite materials of the coin is very hard not, impossible not to affect the inner wall of the rim, and this Lincoln is a tough guy to bungle with. I used a sandpaper of the obverse and a sharp knife on the reverse trying to remove the letter T. Photos are attached.
Re: Untrusted 200?? Lincoln Cent
Here are photos of the inside wall of the rim. This is as close as I can get with my camera.
Re: Untrusted 200?? Lincoln Cent
My theory about this coin is that it may not be a PMD. In my photos it shows that the rim where the abrasion is, seems not to be affected. Likewise, the abraded area where the field meets the inside wall of the rim is neatly aligned. If it was manually made, a special tool should be needed to keep the consistency of the abrasion through out the whole length of the affected area. I think the abraded area was already present and extended up to the edge of the coin in its planchet stage. And when the strike made to form the rim, the abrasion was smoothen up when the metal was stretched to shape the convex form of the rim. Thus we have a smooth condition of the rim. I can not think of any other way the anomaly came about.
As stated photography is very important in this hobby, wherein unfortunately I have a long way to go. My photos are lacking in details and micro shots. I have seen real beautiful close up shots posted by our moderator, Daniel and other members. With better photos I am sure we can learn more from this unique coin. I am willing to lend the coin to our moderator if he would like a shot at it.
As stated photography is very important in this hobby, wherein unfortunately I have a long way to go. My photos are lacking in details and micro shots. I have seen real beautiful close up shots posted by our moderator, Daniel and other members. With better photos I am sure we can learn more from this unique coin. I am willing to lend the coin to our moderator if he would like a shot at it.
-
- Forum Supporter
- Posts: 1863
- Joined: Sat Sep 21, 2013 6:08 pm
- Has thanked: 236 times
- Been thanked: 36 times
Re: Untrusted 200?? Lincoln Cent
I have only been back in collecting a couple of years and I thought it was odd there are no marks on the rim also, but people do some odd things to coins to trick or fool others. Unfortunately the testing on it has definitely made it PMD now. It seems that if the "anomaly" had been on the planchet prior to striking there would be none of it on the devices (base of bust along the rim, E of WE, date, etc.) because of the pressure from the strike. And the die did form the devices as evidenced by the date being visible, even better after your experiment.
Also notice the color around the scratches and field near the rim at K7-8 (Thank you Pahl1 for that lesson to show locations on a coin) on the obverse. That area is darker and more oxidized than the "anomaly" which to me indicates the "anomaly" is a more recent abrasion.
And it could not be damage to the die (die scratches) because the scratches would not get to the deep areas on the die (date), which form the high points of the coin devices.
Also notice the color around the scratches and field near the rim at K7-8 (Thank you Pahl1 for that lesson to show locations on a coin) on the obverse. That area is darker and more oxidized than the "anomaly" which to me indicates the "anomaly" is a more recent abrasion.
And it could not be damage to the die (die scratches) because the scratches would not get to the deep areas on the die (date), which form the high points of the coin devices.
- Daniel
- Administrator
- Posts: 26230
- Joined: Wed Jan 28, 2009 4:59 pm
- Location: Ohio
- Has thanked: 1123 times
- Been thanked: 4093 times
- Contact:
Re: Untrusted 200?? Lincoln Cent
Anything incuse into the die will be concave or raised on the surface of the coin, and the lines on this coin are into the metal. I can think of a couple things that could be used to do this and a jewelers tools would be one, or someone could have your a fine grit, Dremel bit sander.
Re: Untrusted 200?? Lincoln Cent
Why would anyone do this to a coin then throw it back into circulation. What would he gain from it. Often times photos are very deceiving. I hope to get a really close up picture of the area along the side of the wall of the rim.
- Daniel
- Administrator
- Posts: 26230
- Joined: Wed Jan 28, 2009 4:59 pm
- Location: Ohio
- Has thanked: 1123 times
- Been thanked: 4093 times
- Contact:
Re: Untrusted 200?? Lincoln Cent
Because people like to play and experiment and try to create mint errors; I've seen it all my life and have seen just about every experiment on a coin. People almost never gain from it, it usually doesn't work out so it becomes change.
- mhonzell
- Administrator
- Posts: 2734
- Joined: Mon Jul 22, 2013 2:14 pm
- Location: Arizona
- Has thanked: 172 times
- Been thanked: 461 times
Re: Untrusted 200?? Lincoln Cent
A pointed dremel bit is a good guess. Original owner may have been trying to see if he could clean a coin with it. This was just practice.
- Paul
- Master Die Variety Examiner
- Posts: 18835
- Joined: Wed May 29, 2013 9:19 pm
- Location: Wisconsin
- Has thanked: 897 times
- Been thanked: 3272 times
Re: Untrusted 200?? Lincoln Cent
i just can not give a "definitive answer" here.........
without first hand hugeeyes's on coin.
without first hand hugeeyes's on coin.
-
- Coin Collector
- Posts: 42
- Joined: Sat Jun 06, 2015 10:19 pm
Re: Untrusted 200?? Lincoln Cent
Before the hardcore brainstorming begins, I was wondering if anyone noticed that the "brush" marks on the obv and rev sides are in exactly (??) the same direction on the coin.
This hints to me that they were probably made at the same time and by the same devise, which excludes an electric toothbrush.
This hints to me that they were probably made at the same time and by the same devise, which excludes an electric toothbrush.
Re: Untrusted 200?? Lincoln Cent
If the owner wanted to clean the coin he would have stopped after a few strokes due to the given results. Experiment maybe - but for what. I guess PALH1 is right. A real good close up photo of the coin may give us some answers.
- Paul
- Master Die Variety Examiner
- Posts: 18835
- Joined: Wed May 29, 2013 9:19 pm
- Location: Wisconsin
- Has thanked: 897 times
- Been thanked: 3272 times
Re: Untrusted 200?? Lincoln Cent
100% out of left field guess here......pocketchange wrote:Before the hardcore brainstorming begins, I was wondering if anyone noticed that the "brush" marks on the obv and rev sides are in exactly (??) the same direction on the coin.
This hints to me that they were probably made at the same time and by the same devise, which excludes an electric toothbrush.
this cent may have been used as a "shim", for round metal stock of some sort,....
& the stock "shifted" a scootch..........leaving the "semi-circular scrape mark"??........IDK, :dunno :confused: :dunno
- mhonzell
- Administrator
- Posts: 2734
- Joined: Mon Jul 22, 2013 2:14 pm
- Location: Arizona
- Has thanked: 172 times
- Been thanked: 461 times
Re: Untrusted 200?? Lincoln Cent
If I wanted to learn to clean with a dremel, what coin would I use? Yes, the results are not what is desired, but how do you learn? You keep going.
I'm leaning in this direction due to the random trailing lines on the left edges of the "defect". It's a ragged edge.
As others stated, if it was on the die, it would have been raised above the normal face of the die to create this incused area. Not likely.
Polish marks on the die would have dug into the face of the die. Since the last digit of the date is missing, and that is incuse to the die, that much polishing would resemble a cud. A significantly raised area in the field. The digit would not be lower than the other digits.
The combination of random trail marks and the missing digit indicate PMD.
I don't think that's what you want to hear, so I'd recommend sending it in to ANACS for a variety diagnosis and then get back with us.
I'm leaning in this direction due to the random trailing lines on the left edges of the "defect". It's a ragged edge.
As others stated, if it was on the die, it would have been raised above the normal face of the die to create this incused area. Not likely.
Polish marks on the die would have dug into the face of the die. Since the last digit of the date is missing, and that is incuse to the die, that much polishing would resemble a cud. A significantly raised area in the field. The digit would not be lower than the other digits.
The combination of random trail marks and the missing digit indicate PMD.
I don't think that's what you want to hear, so I'd recommend sending it in to ANACS for a variety diagnosis and then get back with us.
Re: Untrusted 200?? Lincoln Cent
I don't think the problem is on the die. I guess the abrasion was already on the planchet when it was struck. Good suggestion mhonzell, I might just do that for whatever its worth.
Re: Untrusted 200?? Lincoln Cent
Ops I stand corrected on my last post. Abrasion could not have been on the planchet else the motto would have covered the abrasion.
Re: Untrusted 200?? Lincoln Cent
I copied this image from the website of "http://lincolncentsonline.com/filleddie.html". The statement following these photo states "Errors like the last two shown above can be confusing at times. Grease filled dies or low pressure strikes? Since the rim is formed during the strike, and these examples have full rims, they are struck through errors and not weak strikes".
There seems to be a similar anomaly with my coin. Opinions and comments will be highly appreciated.
There seems to be a similar anomaly with my coin. Opinions and comments will be highly appreciated.
- mhonzell
- Administrator
- Posts: 2734
- Joined: Mon Jul 22, 2013 2:14 pm
- Location: Arizona
- Has thanked: 172 times
- Been thanked: 461 times
Re: Untrusted 200?? Lincoln Cent
Grease-filled and low pressure strikes do not result in a ragged edge or varying intensity of the lines to the area in question.
(Cropped area of your coin. Look at edge of area and intensity of various lines.)
(Cropped area of your coin. Look at edge of area and intensity of various lines.)
- Attachments
-
- IMG_4709.JPG (16.13 KiB) Viewed 3043 times
- Paul
- Master Die Variety Examiner
- Posts: 18835
- Joined: Wed May 29, 2013 9:19 pm
- Location: Wisconsin
- Has thanked: 897 times
- Been thanked: 3272 times
Re: Untrusted 200?? Lincoln Cent
:agree:mhonzell wrote:Grease-filled and low pressure strikes do not result in a ragged edge or varying intensity of the lines to the area in question.
(Cropped area of your coin. Look at edge of area and intensity of various lines.)
-
- Similar Topics
- Replies
- Views
- Last post
-
- 6 Replies
- 1330 Views
-
Last post by Birdyq
-
- 5 Replies
- 314 Views
-
Last post by Daniel
-
- 5 Replies
- 562 Views
-
Last post by Earle42
-
- 3 Replies
- 346 Views
-
Last post by Earle42
-
- 7 Replies
- 993 Views
-
Last post by Escape4x4
-
- 6 Replies
- 784 Views
-
Last post by Earle42
-
- 2 Replies
- 1992 Views
-
Last post by PetesPockets55
-
- 4 Replies
- 8115 Views
-
Last post by Earle42
-
- 2 Replies
- 121 Views
-
Last post by Daniel
-
- 7 Replies
- 515 Views
-
Last post by Musicbox man63