2000 South Carolina Quarter / Half balnk

Post anything about coin grading holders, questions, images, facts announcements. If it's in, or about, or is a coin holders this is where to post it.

Moderator: Daniel

Post Reply
Message
Author
meek_420
Coining Around
Posts: 3
Joined: Sat Nov 22, 2014 8:49 pm
Location: Long Island, NY
Contact:

2000 South Carolina Quarter / Half balnk

#1 Unread post by meek_420 » Sat Nov 22, 2014 9:40 pm

Hello everyone, I'm new to the forum - I stumbled upon this 2000 South Carolina quarter today. I was wondering if anyone could provide some insight in terms of how common this is, as well as it it's worth anything in relation to collector(s) Also what might be said value?

Front Side.jpg
Rear Side.jpg

Thank you for your time


-Mike



User avatar
Daniel
Administrator
Administrator
Posts: 13249
Joined: Wed Jan 28, 2009 4:59 pm
Location: Ohio
Has thanked: 50 times
Been thanked: 97 times
Contact:

Re: 2000 South Carolina Quarter / Half balnk

#2 Unread post by Daniel » Sun Nov 23, 2014 12:33 am

It could be a uniface strike when another planchet get's in the way and the die strikes them both so that one doesn't get struck with the intended design, but it blank on one side. It's worth something but I am not sure if that's what this is, so it needs a better image or looked at in hand.

User avatar
Paul
Master Die Variety Examiner
Master Die Variety Examiner
Posts: 5306
Joined: Wed May 29, 2013 9:19 pm
Location: Wisconsin
Has thanked: 28 times
Been thanked: 47 times

Re: 2000 South Carolina Quarter / Half balnk

#3 Unread post by Paul » Sun Nov 23, 2014 11:31 am

1. does the 'center' of the 'blank side', have a "small dot"?...or a tiny 'raised area'?

2. if you look at the outer rim, can you 'see any markings', does the 'reeding' have any (3-4) "flattened areas"?

3. if you look at the coin 'from the side', at a sharper 'angle', with 'a single light source' that is "AWAY FROM YOU", do you see any concentric circles on the blank side?
whistling2:
C.O.N.E.C.A. Wi State Rep
Fly-In Club Wi State Rep

User avatar
mhonzell
Administrator
Administrator
Posts: 2181
Joined: Mon Jul 22, 2013 2:14 pm
Location: Missouri
Has thanked: 2 times
Been thanked: 9 times
Contact:

Re: 2000 South Carolina Quarter / Half balnk

#4 Unread post by mhonzell » Sun Nov 23, 2014 4:57 pm

Please weigh the coin.

Is an error, all the metal will be there, just unformed. Should weigh 5.67g
Thickness at the rim is also likely only slightly affected by the error. Should be 1.75 mm.

Lastly, do you see three layers on the edge, or two?
(If silver, there will be only one, but this doesn't appear to be a proof.)


All these questions point to someone intentionally removing the obverse layer of the coin.

meek_420
Coining Around
Posts: 3
Joined: Sat Nov 22, 2014 8:49 pm
Location: Long Island, NY
Contact:

Re: 2000 South Carolina Quarter / Half balnk

#5 Unread post by meek_420 » Sun Nov 23, 2014 5:28 pm

PALH1 wrote:1. does the 'center' of the 'blank side', have a "small dot"?...or a tiny 'raised area'?

A small dot about half the size of a pea in what I would call the exact center.

2. if you look at the outer rim, can you 'see any markings', does the 'reeding' have any (3-4) "flattened areas"?

Upon further examination of the side (see image)
Reed.jpg
there are there slightly, my fingernail doesn't really catch, they feel smooth.[/i][/color]

3. if you look at the coin 'from the side', at a sharper 'angle', with 'a single light source' that is "AWAY FROM YOU", do you see any concentric circles on the blank side?
whistling2: [/size]
There appears to be 3 concentric circles looking at it the way you described, if I tilt it the other way I could see my fingers reflection

meek_420
Coining Around
Posts: 3
Joined: Sat Nov 22, 2014 8:49 pm
Location: Long Island, NY
Contact:

Re: 2000 South Carolina Quarter / Half balnk

#6 Unread post by meek_420 » Sun Nov 23, 2014 5:34 pm

mhonzell wrote:Please weigh the coin.

Is an error, all the metal will be there, just unformed. Should weigh 5.67g
Thickness at the rim is also likely only slightly affected by the error. Should be 1.75 mm.

Lastly, do you see three layers on the edge, or two?
(If silver, there will be only one, but this doesn't appear to be a proof.)


All these questions point to someone intentionally removing the obverse layer of the coin.
I have access to a electronic high power microscope at work and a better scale than my food scale here at home. I will report these findings tomorrow, thank you all for the help so far; I really appreciate it.

-Mike

Post Reply