Archive for April 2009
Counterfeit PCI holders?
Hello. I have discovered the following holder. It is a PCI holder. However, it would appear to be a counterfeit. The holder does not have the mintage on the holder, and is generally poor quality. We all want to alert our dear readers, as we hope that it may be able to help prevent you from purchasing a counterfeit. Please take note of all details. I would love to hear your thoughts on this, and, as usual, comments are welcome.

1914-D Lincoln Cent Guide- Identify/Authenticate
Fake 1914-D Lincoln Cent
The 1914-D is one of the most “faked” Lincoln Cent Key Dates, and many fakes are made from 1944-D Lincoln Cents. However, a collector can learn certain details so they don’t become a victim to a sellers scam.
1944-D whizzed to look like a 1914-D
Here’s a magnified example of the above 1944-D, and you can see the scratch lines where someone rubbed off the four to make it look like a “1″.
Authentic 1914-D Lincoln Cent
Here’s an authentic 1914-D Cent, and an true 1914-D was struck with certain die characteristics, and if two or more of these are not present then it’s most likely a fake. First, notice the D mint mark on the authentic version and compare it to the fake, the D will have more of a “boxed” appearance and be angler inside the “D”. Second, near the third fold of Lincoln’s shirt where it meets his over coat, there should be a die crack connecting it to the rim. Third, a true 1914-D will not have the designer initials V.D.B. under the shoulder, the designer initials where not placed on this area of the coin until 1918.
If a seller refuses to give close up photos of these areas for a diagnostic then do not bid on the coin. It’s best to buy a graded and authenticated version until one can learn how to identify this rare date.How To Identify A 1922 “No D” Lincoln Wheat Cent


The 1922 “No D” Lincoln Cent is one of the most desirable dates in this series, and is one of the most counterfeited and mis-identified varieties in small cent collecting. First, a collector must learn why some 1922 cents don’t have a mint mark, an important part of authentication. The dies used by the Denver mint that resulted in “No D” and “Weak D” mint mark 1922 types where beacause of over-used dies. This resulted in some 1922-D Cents to have weaknesses in details of many of the design features, and not just the the mint mark.
It’s this reason that helps the collector better identify authentic “No D’s” and “Weak D’s”. A fully struck 1922 without a mint mark is 99% of the time an altered 1922-D, where the mint mark was removed. Almost every 1922 “No D” types will show weakness in strike on much of the details. An example is the picture below.

Many No D types will show a strong TRUST while the rest of the motto isn’t clear or as detailed. Also, a No D will have a strong second 2 in the date as shown in the picture below. It also must not have any trace of a mint mark, if it does, then it will always be authenticated as a 1922 Weak D.

Currently, experts recognize four die states for the 1922-D:
1922-D with full mint mark: A semi-key date that was struck with new dies.
1922 Weak D: The dies where overworked, but not as overused as the dies that create the No D.
1922 No D Weak Reverse: The obverse and reverse where struck with overused dies.
1922 No D Strong Reverse: The obverse was struck with an overused die and the obverse with a new die.
Remember, the dies that created these coins where overused and overworked dies. So, a Weak D or No D 1922 Lincoln Cent will always show weakness of other features of the coin’s design. Always pay close attention to the area where the mint mark should be located, and look for any signs that the D has been artificially removed.
For more information visit Lincoln Cent Facts, Mintages, Values
